RobotWorld：多様なタスクと身体性にわたるロボット利用のためのマルチモーダルエージェントベンチマーク
RobotWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Robot Use Across Diverse Tasks and Embodiments
汎用エージェントがロボットインターフェースを通じて物理タスクを実行できるかを評価する84タスクのシミュレーションベンチマークを提案し、能力の転移と失敗要因を分析した。
詳しい要約
1. どんなもの？
2. 先行研究と比べてどこがすごい？
3. 技術・手法の肝は？
4. どうやって有効だと検証した？
5. 議論はある？
6. 次に読むべき論文は？
※ AIが要旨から生成した要約です。正確性は原文をご確認ください。
著者: Zhiqin Yang, Chenxin Li, Xiaomeng Hu, Yibin Liu, Weidong Huang, Jiankai Sun, Haitao Li, Zijian Wu, Yuzhi Huang, Fanding Huang, Hanwen Sun, Jiashun Liu, Jingqi Tong, Mingxin Huang, Shaoli Hu, Shijue Huang, Tianyi Bai, Xinyuan Wang, Yunlong Lin, Zhengyang Tang, Zhexin Zhang, Zhuo Chen, Xierui Song, Juntao Dai, Boyuan Chen, Jiaming Ji, Fangneng Zhan, Mengkang Hu, Wei Xue, Yonggang Zhang, Han Hu, Tsung-Yi Ho, Yike Guo
分類: cs.RO, cs.LG
原文アブストラクト
General-purpose agents increasingly write code, use tools, and complete complex digital tasks, raising the question of how far these capabilities carry into the physical world. To investigate this, we introduce RobotWorld, a challenging simulation testbed for robot use: turning instructions and observations into physical task execution through robot interfaces. Its 84 tasks span manipulation, mobile manipulation, locomotion, driving, and aerial control, with explicit interaction budgets and executable success checks. By analysing task outcomes alongside execution traces, we identify both the capabilities that transfer and the gaps that prevent reliable completion. Furthermore, we find that current agents can construct sophisticated perception and control workflows, including image segmentation, camera calibration, spatial estimation, and dynamics-based computation. These capabilities, however, do not consistently compose into successful behaviour: agents lose task-relevant object states despite reaching commanded poses, fail to correct ineffective actions, recover too late, or mistake unfinished tasks for completion. This uneven transfer also differs across models: Astra succeeds more often on spatial and constrained-contact goals, whereas Opus 5.5 succeeds more often on continuous-balance and timed-interaction goals. By linking these outcomes to execution behaviour, RobotWorld provides both a rigorous proving ground and an empirical account of the remaining capability gaps, thereby establishing concrete targets for training and designing more reliable physical-world agents.