RoboPhys-3D: 3D再構成による包括的な具現化世界モデル評価
RoboPhys-3D: A Comprehensive Embodied World Model Evaluation via 3D Reconstruction
ロボット操作タスクのビデオ世界モデルを3D再構成に基づいて評価するベンチマークを提案し、生成ビデオの3Dシーン整合性とタスク実行可能性を測定する。
詳しい要約
1. どんなもの?
2. 先行研究と比べてどこがすごい?
3. 技術・手法の肝は?
4. どうやって有効だと検証した?
5. 議論はある?
6. 次に読むべき論文は?
※ AIが要旨から生成した要約です。正確性は原文をご確認ください。
著者: Tianyi Wang, Jiazhou Chen, Yiming Xu, Xiangyu Li, Tianyi Zeng, Chih-Hsien Chou, Ning Lu, Liang Peng, Junfeng Jiao, Christian Claudel
分類: cs.RO, cs.AI, cs.CV, cs.ET, eess.SY
原文アブストラクト
Video world models increasingly serve as data engines, action planners, and simulators for embodied AI, but conventional embodied world model (EWM) benchmarks lack a unified 3D-grounded protocol for establishing whether generated rollouts preserve the underlying 3D scene state or translate into executable actions. We introduce RoboPhys-3D, a 3D-grounded EWM benchmark built on RoboTwin 2.0, covering 50 manipulation tasks across four regimes, with 5,000 episodes and 25,000 multi-view ground-truth videos. A defining feature of RoboPhys-3D is that generated and ground-truth videos are processed through the same 3D reconstruction pipeline, enabling reconstruction-induced error to be distinguished from generation-induced error. The RoboPhys-3D benchmark organizes 50 complementary metrics into 18 sub-dimensions across four levels: pixel-level fidelity, 3D geometry consistency, state-level understanding, and task-level completeness. We further introduce Average Full Score, a hierarchical score averaging all 50 metrics for comprehensive evaluation, and RoboPhyscore, a compact task-aligned score averaging the metrics most strongly correlated with task success. Among the four representative video world models, Cosmos 3 achieves the highest RoboPhyscore (0.6330, 92.7% of ground truth), while state- and execution-grounded metrics reveal substantial failures that perceptual and vision-language model-based judgments fail to capture. RoboPhyscore further exhibits strong agreement with human evaluation (Pearson r = 0.9761 and Spearman \r{ho} = 0.8962), demonstrating the importance of grounded, execution-aware evaluation for EWM capability.