EgoTSR++: 一人称視点の時空間推論によるタスク進捗理解
EgoTSR++: Egocentric Spatiotemporal Reasoning for Task Progress Understanding
一人称視点の2つの観測からタスクの進捗を順序に依存せず判断するフレームワークEgoTSRを提案し、順序バイアスを診断するベンチマークと双方向監督データ、段階的CoTカリキュラムを導入した。
著者: Xiaoda Yang, Can Wang, Yuxiang Liu, Pengfei Zhou, Jianwen Lou, Shuicheng Yan
分類: cs.CV
原文アブストラクト
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have advanced rapidly in static visual understanding, yet remain unreliable when judging how an egocentric task is progressing. Given a task instruction and two visual observations, a model should determine which state is closer to the goal by analyzing task-relevant object configurations and spatial relations, rather than relying on timestamps or presentation order. This distinction is critical in manipulation, where retries, corrective actions, and temporary regressions make progress inherently non-monotonic. We introduce EgoTSR, a unified framework for diagnosing and improving order-robust task-progress understanding. First, SpatialLogic-Bench evaluates each physical state pair in both original and order-swapped presentations across short- and long-horizon settings, exposing whether a model follows task-state evidence or chronological shortcuts. Second, our data construction pipeline converts successful, approximately monotonic manipulation and first-person trajectories into bidirectional supervision; LongTag further preserves intermediate subtask structure for long-horizon comparison, while failure-aware data extend learning to regressions and recoveries. Third, a progressive CoT-to-Tag curriculum first supervises evidence-grounded interpretation of task-relevant state changes and then consolidates the comparison rule through scalable label-only training. Experiments reveal substantial input-order bias in representative VLMs. EgoTSR achieves 92.4% long-horizon accuracy with a 0.1-point forward-inverse Gap. Failure-aware supervision further improves accuracy on non-monotonic trajectories by 11.8 points and Recovery Accuracy by 11.2 points, while maintaining broad visual and spatial capabilities. These results establish goal-conditioned state comparison as an explicit formulation of egocentric spatiotemporal reasoning for task-progress understanding.