実行までを見据えた拡散プランニング
ExecDiffuser: Closing the Sample-to-Execution Gap in Diffusion Planning
生成した候補軌道と実際に制御に採用される軌道の乖離を「サンプル・実行ギャップ」として定式化し、候補生成・選択・再計画を実行意味論で結合する枠組みExecDiffuserを提案。nuPlanなどで閉ループ性能を向上。
詳しい要約
1. どんなもの？
2. 先行研究と比べてどこがすごい？
3. 技術・手法の肝は？
4. どうやって有効だと検証した？
5. 議論はある？
6. 次に読むべき論文は？
※ AIが要旨から生成した要約です。正確性は原文をご確認ください。
著者: Shuo Pei, Bosun Liang, Saihui Zha, Chen Sun, Huachun Tan, Yong Wang
分類: cs.RO
原文アブストラクト
Generative planners are often evaluated by the trajectories they can generate, although closed-loop driving ultimately depends on the single candidate committed to control. We identify this mismatch as the sample-to-execution gap and show that improving proposal quality alone can worsen the executed decision. Here, we introduce ExecDiffuser, a recurrent proposal-to-execution framework that couples candidate generation, trajectory selection, and subsequent replanning through shared execution semantics. Intent-Guided Diffusion Proposal (IGD) assigns hypothesis responsibility and shapes trajectories with execution-conditioned supervision. Execution-Grounded Selection (EGS) learns a candidate-conditioned publication utility, commits one trajectory to control, and returns it as context for the next planning cycle. Across nuPlan, InterPlan, and NAVSIM, ExecDiffuser achieves leading closed-loop performance against strong state-of-the-art baselines. Under a unified five-seed protocol, it obtains an average score of 85.62, improving over Diffusion Planner and FlowDrive by 4.02 and 1.31 points, respectively. On NAVSIM, it achieves 92.6 PDMS under the official evaluation pipeline. Matched counterfactual analysis further shows that ExecDiffuser more reliably converts strong candidates into committed decisions, while prefix interventions confirm that this advantage persists after physical execution and subsequent replanning.