行動履歴メモリと二重エキスパートノイズ除去による長期的視覚言語行動ポリシー
Remember What You Did: Action-History Memory with Dual-Expert Denoising for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Policies
凍結したVLAにMambaベースのメモリと軽量PreAction Expertを追加し、行動履歴を活用して長期的タスクの知覚的曖昧性を解消する手法を提案。
詳しい要約
1. どんなもの?
2. 先行研究と比べてどこがすごい?
3. 技術・手法の肝は?
4. どうやって有効だと検証した?
5. 議論はある?
6. 次に読むべき論文は?
※ AIが要旨から生成した要約です。正確性は原文をご確認ください。
著者: Yaxin Zhao, Dianye Huang, Chenwei Wang, Chenguang Yang, Zhongliang Jiang
分類: cs.RO
原文アブストラクト
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have driven rapid progress in robotic manipulation, demonstrating strong fine-grained control and promising performance on long-horizon tasks. However, many existing VLAs lack explicit access to interaction history, making them vulnerable to perceptual aliasing: similar current observations and robot states at different task stages may induce action ambiguity and lower success rate. Existing methods incorporate temporal or progress cues through feature conditioning, action-prior modification, or sampling guidance. However, methods that jointly fine-tune memory modules and the base VLA incur additional policy-training costs, motivating the separation of trainable history-conditioned steering from frozen base-policy refinement. We propose ActMem-VLA, a dual-expert handover architecture that augments a frozen, fine-tuned VLA with a memory plugin comprising a Mamba-based memory module and a lightweight PreAction Expert (PAE). Specifically, Mamba encodes executed-action history into memory that conditions PAE alongside current context. With these inputs, PAE steers task progression during early, high-noise denoising, then passes the partially denoised action to the frozen Action Expert (AE) to refine action details during the remaining low-noise steps. The fine-tuned base VLA remains frozen throughout training, while only the Mamba module and PAE are jointly optimized. On LIBERO-Mem, ActMem-VLA achieves 80.8\% average success across all ten tasks, compared with 65.2\% for $π_{0.5}$ and 49.5\% for MemoryVLA, while introducing only 3.45\% additional parameters. Across four real-world tasks, it improves the average success rate over $π_{0.5}$ by 28.8\%.