日本フィジカルAI新聞

世界のフィジカルAIを、日本語で。

週刊ニュースレター購読
医療画像予測arXiv:2610.09194

患者・部位・事前分布(P³):医療ワールドモデルにおける個人化とは何か

Patient, Place, Prior (P$^3$): What Counts as Personalization in Medical World Models?

シェア:XThreadsFacebookLINEはてブBluesky

患者の縦断的画像履歴・病変位置・集団平均を分離して評価するP³監査を提案し、乳がんMRI予測モデルCancer JEPAで患者固有の予測価値を検証した。

著者: Xingrui Gu, Hanxue Gu, Yuxiang Zhang, Yang Yang

分類: cs.LG, cs.AI

原文アブストラクト

Longitudinal models forecast how a patient's imaging state evolves, but accuracy does not show whether the patient's observed trajectory drives the prediction. A population-average forecast may be useful but cannot establish a patient-specific world-model claim. We introduce Patient, Place, Prior (P$^3$), an audit asking whether a forecast benefits from the patient's longitudinal imaging history (Patient), benefits from patient-matched externally supplied spatial support (Place), and gains predictive value beyond a population-average prediction under matched support and context (Prior). We also propose Cancer JEPA, a one-step model that forecasts frozen representations of future breast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI examinations during neoadjuvant therapy. It adds a lesion-constrained neural correction, trained with an occlusion-based latent objective, to a patient-conditioned low-complexity reduced-rank regression baseline. This factorization permits a post-hoc P$^3$ audit of the frozen model. In a validation cohort previously used in development, forecast error is lower when the neural correction receives the patient's history rather than another patient's and patient-matched lesion occupancy maps rather than substituted maps. However, the descriptive 95% interval comparing the correction computed from patient history with the population-average neural correction includes zero. P$^3$ thus separates input use from evidence of patient-specific predictive value beyond a population-level pattern.

PR本紙発行元 EmplifAI