オフライン方策改善に1ステップで十分か？

原文アブストラクト

Behavior regularization in offline reinforcement learning limits the exploitation of critic errors, but strong anchoring can also restrict policy improvement. We study how policy improvement is composed through multi-step proximal policy improvement (MPI), which re-centers each proximal objective on the preceding policy. We parameterize the procedure by a nominal total horizon $T$ and $K$ stages with local horizon $T/K$, distinguishing subdivision at a fixed total horizon from additional refinement at a common local horizon. Our analysis shows that sequential re-centering can reach endpoints unavailable to any single proximal step and characterizes how subdivision reduces the leading local discretization error of ideal updates under a fixed critic. We consider TD3+BC and IQL-based policy extraction to examine how improvement composition interacts with actor objectives and policy geometry. TD3+BC experiments on D4RL locomotion suggest that subdivision can broaden the range of useful total horizons, while adding refinement stages at a fixed small local horizon can improve return. The results identify improvement composition as a design choice alongside regularization strength, with distinct effects from horizon subdivision and additional policy extraction.