日本フィジカルAI新聞

世界のフィジカルAIを、日本語で。

週刊ニュースレター購読
ディープフェイク防御arXiv:2608.27492v1

汚染ピクセルでディープフェイク動画を暴く

Can Tainted Pixels Expose Deepfake Videos?

シェア:XThreadsFacebookLINEはてブBluesky

公開された顔動画に視認しにくい構造化ノイズを埋め込み、ブラックボックスの改ざんツールで加工された際に透かしが顕在化する能動的防御手法を提案した。

著者: Juan Hu, Shaojing Fan, Sanjay Saha, Marc Herrera, Terence Sim

分類: cs.CR, cs.CV

原文アブストラクト

Publicly-acceesible face-manipulation tools have made deepfake creation accessible to non-expert users. Against these, existing defenses are mostly post-hoc, detecting only after forgery has occurred, and operating on still images rather than videos. Research is lacking in i) the proactive protection of published facial videos against black-box manipulation tools, and in (ii) understanding its perceptual effect on human viewers. We introduce TaintedPixels, a proactive video-protection method built around an asymmetric visibility trade-off: the embedded watermark should remain inconspicuous in the published video but become obvious once a downstream tool manipulates the video. TaintedPixels injects structured periodic perturbations into the blue channel of facial regions and refines them under stripe-visibility, color-cast, and video-level LPIPS budgets, with lightweight motion-adaptive deployment. We believe TaintedPixels is the first proactive defense designed specifically against black-box manipulation tools rather than image-level pipelines or specific surrogate generators. Across three publicly available off-the-shelf video manipulation tools and two off-the-shelf detectors, TaintedPixels attains the highest forgery fake rate while keeping perturbations small (LPIPS = 0.0042). Our non-expert human study, conducted on a diverse set of 300 video stimuli spanning different lighting conditions, backgrounds, and skin tones, shows that protected source videos draw a 3.26% suspicion rate, while forgeries from protected sources are identified as fake much more often than forgeries from unprotected sources (90.72% vs. 56.71%). This validates the effectiveness of TaintedPixels.