TMTPost reports Jiang Xu of Liangyuan Xinchuang's appearance at WAIC

On July 23, 2026, TMTPost published an article about public remarks by Jiang Xu of Liangyuan Xinchuang at the 2026 World Artificial Intelligence Conference (WAIC).

Articles about public remarks at WAIC can offer insight into what companies and researchers are discussing, but they do not in themselves substantiate robot performance in real-world conditions or commercialization. Assessing Liangyuan Xinchuang's technological progress requires real-world results with stated evaluation conditions or verifiable deployment information, separate from reports on remarks.

The article confirms only that public remarks by Liangyuan Xinchuang's Jiang Xu at WAIC were covered in a news report. Publishing an article about remarks does not demonstrate a real-world robot demonstration, performance measurement, product availability or deployment. Anyone using the report to assess the company's technological progress should distinguish the remarks it covers from evidence of implementation that can be independently verified. Related articles we have covered illustrate different types of reporting. OpenAI reportedly sets a public unveiling date for a humanoid robot concerns a reported unveiling date, while leaderobot.com publishes an interview article on embodied intelligence covers the publication of an interview. Neither, on its own, proves real-world performance or deployment. The current report is best understood as coverage of an appearance and public remarks. In evaluating technology, the key question is how public statements connect to results that can later be verified. A real-world demonstration of a defined task, a benchmark with stated conditions and deployment records that third parties can confirm are distinct forms of evidence and should not be conflated. By contrast, Google Cloud AI Research releases Harness²; Google DeepMind study raises repair rate from 24.4% to 48.3% covers research results and figures. The difference between reporting on remarks and research results is not a matter of one article being more valuable than another, but of what each substantiates. The next question to examine for Liangyuan Xinchuang is whether its public statements are tied to specific robot behaviors, evaluation conditions and reproducible results. The material available here does not confirm product specifications, real-world performance figures, deployment sites or mass-production status. These details should not be inferred; reports on appearances should be tracked separately from technological and business progress. See the original source for details of the remarks and their substance.