TMTPost Publishes Article on the Embodied Intelligence Industry

TMTPost published an article about the embodied intelligence industry on September 1, 2026.

What can be confirmed in this case is that TMTPost published an article on September 1, 2026. The materials provided contain no primary sources, such as official announcements, investor relations disclosures or academic papers, to support specific statements covered in the article. The fact that the article was published should therefore be considered separately from verification of the business activities and figures described in it. Rather than treating the article's contents as a direct account of industry conditions, the first step is to check what evidence supports them and whether the relevant period and calculation methods are specified. Readers should consult the original source to verify the article's detailed statements and arguments. This distinction also applies to related articles published by Physical AI News. In AgiBot Proposes “Worken,” a Metric for Robot Operation; Reported by leaderobot.com, we noted that while the metric's formula was introduced, its definition, measurement method and application to pricing could not be confirmed. This shows that presenting a metric's name and formula is not the same as establishing a basis for comparing the operation of different robots or worksites. Figures cited in articles should likewise be assessed by distinguishing their definitions, the entity that compiled them and their scope. Another example is leaderobot.com Publishes Commentary on Computing Resources for Embodied AI, in which Physical AI News noted that publication of a commentary does not itself constitute independent verification of its views. For reports on company revenue, shipments and fundraising, humanoid.guide Reports on Developments in AgiBot's Revenue and Humanoid Shipments also explicitly states that the materials provided contain no primary sources. If materials of these different types are presented without distinction, readers could get the impression that reported business metrics prove robots are operating in real-world settings. Revenue and shipments, operating hours and work output each measure different things and are not necessarily interchangeable indicators. The key question in reading this article, therefore, is whether its individual claims can be traced to verifiable primary sources, after confirming that the article was published. Where figures are given, readers should check not only the units, periods and calculation methods, but also the distinctions between shipments and operation, and between deployment and continued use. Within the materials provided, Physical AI News cannot independently confirm such supporting evidence and therefore cannot adopt the article's individual assessments as its own conclusions.