tmtpost publishes article examining Unitree's profitability

On Aug. 8, 2026, tmtpost published an article examining Unitree's profitability.

An article discussing an assessment is not the same as company-released sales or operating results. Coverage of Unitree's operating hours has also cautioned that the test conditions could not be verified. When reading assessments, it is necessary to distinguish the source of the figures from evidence of actual operation.

Articles about a company's profits or valuation serve a different role from primary sources verifying product performance or sales results. The fact that the article was published confirms only that Unitree's valuation became a subject of discussion in the publication; the arguments in the article cannot be treated as the company's official position or as new business results. For the original article's detailed arguments and figures, please consult the original source. Related articles in this newspaper include Leaderobot.com reports on Unitree H2-X video, citing up to about 8 hours of operation, published Oct. 27, 2026. The article's summary describes reporting on the operating time claimed in the video, not an independent verification of the test conditions. Even when operating hours are used as material for discussing an assessment, figures cited in announcements or reporting must be distinguished from results whose conditions can be verified. Also, ROBOTECH 2026 opens in Shenzhen, with exhibits ranging from robot bodies to components and secondary development, published Oct. 29, 2026, and Ruoyu Technology, Geely Auto and Zhengxing Technology demonstrate refueling at ROBOTECH 2026, leaderobot.com reports, published the following day, are articles about exhibits. They do not directly show Unitree's sales or operations, but they illustrate why, when assessing robots, an exhibit, a demonstration of a single task and sustained operation in the field should be treated as distinct levels of evidence. Discussions of company value, too, should be separated from whether a product was exhibited and grounded in materials that establish the applications in which it was used and how continuously. The next things to check are not the estimates in individual assessment articles, but the scope of the results the company discloses and the periods and product categories those figures cover. In addition, whether a video or exhibit report can be considered evidence of actual operation depends on whether operating conditions and duration are verifiable from publicly available information. The information provided here does not allow those conditions or results to be established.