tmtpost.com Publishes Opinion Article on Embodied Intelligence

tmtpost.com published an opinion article about embodied intelligence on October 26, 2026.

The publication of an opinion article does not itself demonstrate the performance of embodied intelligence models or their operation on physical systems. When reading model evaluations or simulation results as evidence of real-world deployment, it is necessary to distinguish the evaluation conditions from reproducibility on physical systems.

The publication of an opinion article and the demonstration of technological progress in robots are separate matters. In embodied intelligence in particular, model-only evaluations, simulation results, evaluations using physical systems and continued operation after deployment cannot be treated as equivalent. Readers should focus not on accepting the article’s assessment as a technological fact, but on what was evaluated and the conditions under which the results were obtained. This distinction also applies when reading coverage of test results involving NVIDIA GR00T 2 and humanoid robots and coverage of humanoid control technology using world models, which we have published. The former reports on test results involving a model, while the latter covers technology related to simulation-based training and real-world application. The existence of an article alone does not establish that results can be reproduced across different environments or tasks. Evaluation conditions, comparison targets and repeatability on physical systems need to be examined separately. Likewise, announcements and reports about AI computing infrastructure describe the foundation for running models; they do not directly demonstrate the control performance of robots or their track record in the field. Our article on NVIDIA’s new AI infrastructure and coverage of robot models and control should be read as evidence of different kinds. Without information connecting computing resources, models, physical systems and operations, the technology’s scope of application and stability cannot be assessed. Accordingly, evaluating claims in an opinion article also requires comparing the conditions of published evaluations with the status of verification on physical systems. Readers should consult the original source for the article’s detailed arguments. What can be confirmed here is that the opinion article was published; the information provided does not include primary sources substantiating the truth or practical utility of the technical claims it discusses.