Forbes Publishes Physical AI Article by Lancesoft Executive

Forbes published an article on November 13, 2026, by Venkatesh Gokulraju of Lancesoft.

Our starting point is that, because the verifiable facts are limited to the article’s publication and the author’s background, we do not assess the validity of the technical themes it addresses or the state of their implementation. The excerpt provided describes Gokulraju as a technology leader at Lancesoft who specializes in AI-powered network automation. This information indicates the author’s position and should be distinguished from technical materials or test results that independently substantiate claims in the article. The article’s headline presents a perspective connecting Physical AI and networks. However, the headline alone does not reveal a specific system architecture, communications method, deployment conditions or benefits. The excerpt provided also ends partway through, so the basis for the discussion, its verification methods and the equipment or operating environment in question cannot be confirmed. For this reason, we do not treat the headline’s framing as the article’s conclusion, nor do we go so far as to say that a particular technology is already in practical use or has solved a specific operational challenge. For the industry, evaluating the article’s claims requires separately checking whether it explains how network connectivity is integrated into the operation of robots and other systems; how they are controlled when communications are unstable; how responsibility for positioning and safety is divided; and what conditions are used to measure latency and uptime. These are not facts confirmed about the article’s content, but points to check when assessing technical claims. The fact that the author’s area of expertise aligns with the article’s argument does not, by itself, prove that a technology has been implemented or establish its performance. Contributions by experts affiliated with companies should also be read with a distinction between an individual’s views, the official position of the affiliated organization and third-party verification results. The information provided here does not make it possible to determine those distinctions or assess supporting materials. Only by reviewing the article’s specific explanations, technical basis and verification conditions can readers evaluate the framing in its headline and the implications for implementation. See the original article for details.